<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Invasion Plans &#187; Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dev.marzopolis.com/category/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dev.marzopolis.com</link>
	<description>[root@marz~]# killing time on planet earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 01:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing Weak SSL for The Slacker Admin</title>
		<link>http://dev.marzopolis.com/2011/06/fixing-weak-ssl-for-the-slacker-admin/</link>
		<comments>http://dev.marzopolis.com/2011/06/fixing-weak-ssl-for-the-slacker-admin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 22:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0ta11ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.marzopolis.com/?p=193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IIS Crypto is a great free tool produced by Nartac Sotware that allows Windows Server/IIS admins to easily enable/disable weak SSL cryptos and ciphers. This is a PCI requirement, and I&#8217;ve seen it show up on many scan using tools designed to probe for compliance. It&#8217;s usually a tedious process of adding/changing registry keys, right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.nartac.com/Products/IISCrypto/Default.aspx">IIS Crypto</a> is a great free tool produced by Nartac Sotware that allows Windows Server/IIS admins to easily enable/disable weak SSL cryptos and ciphers. This is a PCI requirement, and I&#8217;ve seen it show up on many scan using tools designed to probe for compliance. It&#8217;s usually a tedious process of adding/changing registry keys, right up to today&#8217;s current Windows OSes.</p>
<p>I recently had two fully patched Win Server 2008 R2 servers that were failing PCI scans using the McAffee Secure online service. IIS Crypto made short work out of what would&#8217;ve been a longer after hours change. It even has a PCI button that you can just click and it configs the server for compliance. Saved me a ton of work. Microsoft needs to start turning this off by default though and maybe even ask if you want it turned on, just a thought for the guys at Redmond.</p>
<p>In a unique twist, even after verifying the registry keys were correct after running the tool, McAffee still complained about the problem after a post-change scan. <a href="https://www.ssllabs.com/ssldb/index.html">Qualy&#8217;s SSL Site Analyzer</a>, a nifty and free online tool, actually passed it with flying colors. Another interesting venture of theirs is the <a href="https://www.ssllabs.com/projects/client-fingerprinting/index.html">HTTP Client Fingerprinting Using SSL Handshake Analysis</a> project, which produced a mod for Apache and some other interesting reads at the bottom of the page, enjoy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.marzopolis.com/2011/06/fixing-weak-ssl-for-the-slacker-admin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Auditing</title>
		<link>http://dev.marzopolis.com/2008/03/security-auditing/</link>
		<comments>http://dev.marzopolis.com/2008/03/security-auditing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 03:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>t0ta11ed</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.marzopolis.com/2008/03/06/security-auditing/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever you&#8217;re stuck in a small shop with a limited budget, it can be pretty hard to find a good, inexpensive application that can do five things: Port scanning Vulnerability scanning Some kind of patch level detection Wrap everything up into reporting that can show all the results by machine. Doesn&#8217;t cost an arm, leg, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever you&#8217;re stuck in a small shop with a limited budget, it can be pretty hard to find a good, inexpensive application that can do five things:</p>
<p>Port scanning<br />
Vulnerability scanning<br />
Some kind of patch level detection<br />
Wrap everything up into reporting that can show all the results by machine.<br />
Doesn&#8217;t cost an arm, leg, and your first born.</p>
<p>With little to no budget, my auditing tools are varied and I have to cut and paste most of their results into a single report by hand. I&#8217;ve gotten pretty nifty with the report formats using color coded Excel sheets, and I get to flex my writing skills but the manual work involved really is frustrating. However, using a combo of  the usual free tools (Nessus, Nmap, Microsoft Baseline Security Analyzer, Metaspolit, etc.), I&#8217;ve managed to audit a small network of 100+ IPs and 5 subnets in around four to five days, complete with the reports. This also includes external auditing of our two public networks. I still wish I had a free or inexpensive tool that does a lot of what I&#8217;m already doing manually, especially bringing in all of the results into a single report complete with an executive summary.</p>
<p>Now, I could be lazy and just compile all the output these tools already generate and call that a &#8220;report&#8221;, but I&#8217;m the creative type and believe in clear documentation that can translate to both non-technical staff and IT staff. They should have a uniform look, because Nessus&#8217; output format is an HTML file and Nmaps&#8217; is a text or XML file. Putting them all together into a printed out clump just looks sloppy, and I don&#8217;t go for sloppy with documentation.</p>
<p>There are plenty that do that job, but all of them are pretty hefty pricewise, which leaves those with a low budget for such items in the crunch. There is business opportunity in this area, so you would think this market would have a bit more variety. Changes in the security landscape are pushing it in that direction though, as security and compliance are becoming concerns to even some small businesses. If I was a .NET developer, I think I&#8217;d start writing something that did what I wanted. Alas, I&#8217;m not, but if any of them are out there lurking, get to coding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dev.marzopolis.com/2008/03/security-auditing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

